| 2003 WORLD TEAM TANTRIX CHAMPIONSHIP - AT-A-GLANCE |
| MAIN GROUP
TABLES AND THE DRAW FOR THE KO PHASE ONLY |
|
| HELP
WITH ARRANGING GAMES - full details of players and captains |
| List
of Teams that entered the WTTC in seeding order |
| Send a new game result |
| Return to the World
Team Championship home page |
|
| The group
DEADLINE is TODAY, Mon. - so far we have had |
900 |
out of |
900 |
|
games,
100% |
|
| NEW - THE KNOCKOUT PHASE - DRAW & RESULTS |
|
| NEW
- see the HUN A team doing its very best to look scary and enter the caption
competition :-) |
| The Wairarapa Times-Age
article on Tantrix & the WTTC is back by popular demand |
|
| Player N (N =
1, 2, 3, 4 or 5) in any given team plays 3 games against player N in every
other team |
| and the top
two teams in each group on tournament points (TPs) will qualify for the QFs |
|
| CONGRATULATIONS
TO NZL A (seeded 1), HUN A (3), NZL B (5) & AUS B (10) WHO HAVE ALL WON
GROUPS. |
| … also to GBR
A (2), GER A (6), GBR B (9), & GBR C (12), all now sure to qualify for
the QFs too. |
| No of games
before the top two qualifying places were decided: Grp A - 219, B - 221, C -
224, D - 223. |
|
| Biggest
15-game match win: NZL A beat GER B by 211.9-88.1 TPs or 13-1 in games with 1
drawn. |
| Closest
15-game match: GER B beat GBR B by just 151.8-148.2 TPs or 7-7 in games with
1 drawn. |
|
| CLICK ON THE
HEADING FOR ANY GROUP BELOW TO VIEW THE FULL RESULTS FOR THAT GROUP |
| They include
team and player-by-player cross-tables and links to detailed game-by-game
results |
|
|
| WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2003 |
GROUP A |
after |
225 |
of |
225 |
|
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team |
Sd |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS |
15-game Matches |
| Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
WBQ |
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
-> QF1 |
NEW ZEALAND A |
(1) |
|
75 |
57 |
2 |
16 |
|
979.8 |
65% |
-20.5 |
NZL A |
5 |
|
|
| 2nd |
-> QF3 |
GREAT BRITAIN & NI B |
(9) |
|
75 |
34 |
10 |
31 |
|
775.4 |
52% |
0.0 |
GBR B |
2 |
|
3 |
| 3rd |
|
AUSTRALIA A |
(7) |
|
75 |
34 |
5 |
36 |
|
741.9 |
49% |
+3.5 |
AUS A |
2 |
|
3 |
| 4th |
|
GERMANY B |
(15) |
|
75 |
29 |
5 |
41 |
|
692.6 |
46% |
+8.5 |
GER B |
3 |
|
2 |
| 5th |
|
REST OF EUROPE A |
(18) |
|
75 |
30 |
4 |
41 |
|
670.1 |
45% |
+10.5 |
RoE A |
2 |
|
3 |
| 6th |
|
SWEDEN A |
(22) |
|
75 |
26 |
4 |
45 |
|
640.2 |
43% |
+13.5 |
SWE A |
1 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reigning
champions NZL A won this group by more than 200 TPs, almost breaking the 1000
TPs barrier. |
| Their no. 2,
Shaun, won an astonishing 14/15 games, two more than any of the other 119
players in the WTTC. |
| GBR B won a
Titanic battle for 2nd place with no. 7 seeds AUS A (3rd last year), but only
by about 2%. |
| In an
intriguing twist of fate, NZL A will meet GBR C in the QFs while GBR B will
face no. 5 seeds NZL B. |
| All teams in
the group won at least 26 games & at least one match, with SWE's win v
AUS the biggest 'shock'. |
|
| WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2003 |
GROUP B |
after |
225 |
of |
225 |
|
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team |
Sd |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS |
15-game Matches |
| Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
WBQ |
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
-> QF2 |
HUNGARY A |
(3) |
|
75 |
52 |
1 |
22 |
|
929.3 |
62% |
-17.0 |
HUN A |
5 |
|
|
| 2nd |
-> QF4 |
GERMANY A |
(6) |
|
75 |
39 |
4 |
32 |
|
760.7 |
51% |
0.0 |
GER A |
4 |
|
1 |
| 3rd |
|
FINLAND A |
(11) |
|
75 |
38 |
2 |
35 |
|
749.3 |
50% |
+1.0 |
FIN A |
2 |
|
3 |
| 4th |
|
GREAT BRITAIN & NI D |
(14) |
|
75 |
34 |
2 |
39 |
|
747.3 |
50% |
+1.5 |
GBR D |
2 |
|
3 |
| 5th |
|
GUADELOUPE A |
(20) |
|
75 |
28 |
6 |
41 |
|
682.6 |
46% |
+8.0 |
GDL A |
1 |
|
4 |
| 6th |
|
GREAT BRITAIN & NI E |
(24) |
|
75 |
24 |
5 |
46 |
|
630.8 |
42% |
+13.0 |
GBR E |
1 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. 3 seeds
HUN A ran away with this group but may now be regretting it because they have
to play no. 2 |
| seeds GBR A in
the QFs in a half of the draw that also contains no. 1 seeds NZL A. No. 6
seeds GER A, the 2002 |
| runners-up,
made it into the QFs by just 11.4 TPs from FIN A with GBR D only another 2
TPs further back. |
| All teams in
the group won at least one match, with HUN A winning all 5 and GER A beating
all but HUN A. |
|
| WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2003 |
GROUP C |
after |
225 |
of |
225 |
|
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team |
Sd |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS |
15-game Matches |
| Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
WBQ |
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
-> QF3 |
NEW ZEALAND B |
(5) |
|
75 |
49 |
3 |
23 |
|
901.6 |
60% |
-8.5 |
NZL B |
5 |
|
|
| 2nd |
-> QF1 |
GREAT BRITAIN & NI C |
(12) |
|
75 |
39 |
7 |
29 |
|
816.0 |
54% |
0.0 |
GBR C |
4 |
|
1 |
| 3rd |
|
FRANCE A |
(4) |
|
75 |
38 |
4 |
33 |
|
796.1 |
53% |
+2.0 |
FRA A |
3 |
|
2 |
| 4th |
|
NETHERLANDS A |
(17) |
|
75 |
31 |
6 |
38 |
|
705.2 |
47% |
+11.0 |
NED A |
1 |
|
4 |
| 5th |
|
HUNGARY B |
(13) |
|
75 |
29 |
4 |
42 |
|
676.6 |
45% |
+14.0 |
HUN B |
1 |
|
4 |
| 6th |
|
FINLAND B |
(21) |
|
75 |
24 |
6 |
45 |
|
604.5 |
40% |
+21.0 |
FIN B |
1 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. 5 seeds NZL B won this group very
convincingly with just over 900 TPs but GBR C caused a big |
| shock by
knocking out no. 4 seeds FRA A after a fantastic contest that was decided in
the end by less than |
| 20 TPs. NZL C's
QF opponents are GBR B while GBR C will face reigning champions & no. 1
seeds NZL A. |
| it is GBR C who
will face reigning champions & no. 1 seeds NZL A in the QFs, with NZL B
playing GBR B. |
| Every team won
at least one match with GBR C's narrow 154.4-145.5 match win v FRA A being a
crucial result. |
|
| WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2003 |
GROUP D |
after |
225 |
of |
225 |
|
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team |
Sd |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS |
15-game Matches |
| Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
WBQ |
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
-> QF4 |
AUSTRALIA B |
(10) |
|
75 |
45 |
4 |
26 |
|
863.8 |
58% |
-2.5 |
AUS B |
4 |
|
1 |
| 2nd |
-> QF2 |
GREAT BRITAIN & NI A |
(2) |
|
75 |
44 |
3 |
28 |
|
839.8 |
56% |
0.0 |
GBR A |
4 |
|
1 |
| 3rd |
|
UNITED STATES A |
(8) |
|
75 |
37 |
3 |
35 |
|
762.9 |
51% |
+7.5 |
USA A |
2 |
|
3 |
| 4th |
|
FRANCE B |
(16) |
|
75 |
35 |
5 |
35 |
|
752.9 |
50% |
+8.5 |
FRA B |
3 |
|
2 |
| 5th |
|
HUNGARY C |
(23) |
|
75 |
30 |
4 |
41 |
|
678.2 |
45% |
+16.0 |
HUN C |
2 |
|
3 |
| 6th |
|
REST O/T AMERICAS A |
(19) |
|
75 |
22 |
5 |
48 |
|
602.4 |
40% |
+23.5 |
RoA A |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AUS B put in a
very strong performance to win this group by just 24 TPs from no. 2 seeds GBR
A, enabling |
| them to enter
the less daunting half of the KO draw with a QF v no. 6 seeds GER A. GBR A
face HUN A. |
| AUS B &
GBR A both won 4 matches but AUS B's big win in the match between these teams
was crucial. |
|
| KEY: Indiv.
Games = stats for individual player games; Sd = seeding number; Pld = games played |
| W = wins; D = draws; L = losses; P = no-show credits & penalties; TPs = tournament points |
| % = % of possible TPs; WBQ = approx. no. of game wins ahead of or behind the 2nd
qualifying place |
| Technical
note: To find WBQ, the TP% is multiplied the average number of games played
by teams in the |
| group to give
comparable TP scores and it is then assumed that a game win is on average
worth 15.0-5.0 TPs. |
| Matches = stats for 15-game matches, recorded as a win when a team
gets over 150 TPs |
| … but play ALL
games, because total TPs over all matches decides who qualifies, NOT match
wins |
|
| WBQ COLUMN: It
is not that easy to judge from the %s how near qualification your team is, so
"WBQ" shows approximately |
| how many game
wins each team is away from the 2nd qualifying place, assuming that an
average game win is by 5 tiles. |
| eg. if your
team is 1.0 WBQ and you win a game v someone in the 2nd placed team by 5
tiles, your teams will be approx. |
| equal in %
terms afterwards. NB. If you win a game v a different team without the team in 2nd place
playing at the same |
| time, the WBQ
will only change by about 0.5, not by 1. WBQ is quite similar to "games
behind" as used in US sports tables. |
| |
|
| KNOCKOUT PHASE
(25 games per match, 5 per player) |
|
| NEW - THE KNOCKOUT PHASE - DRAW & RESULTS |
|
| QF1 |
Winner Group A - NZL A |
|
v |
|
GBR C - Runner-up Group C |
| QF2 |
Winner Group B - HUN A |
|
v |
|
GBR A - Runner-up Group D |
| QF3 |
Winner Group C - NZL B |
|
v |
|
GBR B - Runner-up Group A |
| QF4 |
Winner Group D - AUS B |
|
v |
|
GER A - Runner-up Group B |
|
| SF1 |
Winner of QF1 |
v |
Winner of QF2 |
| SF2 |
Winner of QF3 |
v |
Winner of QF4 |
|
| 3PPO |
Loser of SF1 |
v |
Loser of SF2 |
|
| FINAL |
Winner of SF1 |
v |
Winner of SF2 |
|
| NEW - THE KNOCKOUT PHASE - DRAW & RESULTS |
|
| Send a New Result |
| Help
with Arranging Games |
| List
of Team in Seeding Order |
| Return to the World
Team Tantrix Championship home page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|