| 3rd WORLD TEAM TANTRIX CHAMPIONSHIP 2004 - AT-A-GLANCE |
| MAIN GROUP
TABLES ONLY AND LINKS TO DETAILED GROUP RESULTS, PRELIM & KO PHASES |
|
| HELP
WITH ARRANGING GAMES - full details of players and captains |
Send a new result |
| List
of Teams that entered the WTTC in seeding order |
| Phase
1 (Preliminary Round) Results page |
Phase
3 (Knockout Phase) Results page |
| RETURN
TO THE WORLD TEAM TANTRIX CHAMPIONSHIP HOME PAGE |
|
| Gp A-D DEADLINE
is Tues. 15 JUNE. Progress so far: |
900 |
out of |
900 |
|
games,
100% |
| Progress (games per group per day) - for Assistant
Controller use |
| The 2003
results implied over 800 TPs should be enough to qualify & below 760 TPs
almost certainly would not be. |
| 2004's results
concurred - 776.9 was the lowest qualifying score and 761.0 TPs was the
highest score to miss out. |
| Player N in
any team plays 3 games against player N in every other team. Top two teams on
TPs qualify for the QFs. |
| Individual
player records (all groups) in this phase |
| GBQ (games
behind last qualification place) is a different measure to TP% of how teams
are doing. The order may |
| be slightly
different if teams are very close and/or have played very different numbers
of games. Please click any |
| "GBQ" column heading for a full
explanation. Some people find GBQ a useful extra tool,
but feel free to ignore it! |
|
| CLICK ANY TEXT IN THE COLOURED BAR ABOVE A GROUP FOR FULL
RESULTS |
| They include team and player-by-player cross-tables for the
group and links to detailed game results |
|
| 3rd WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2004 |
GROUP A |
after |
225 |
out of |
225 |
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team (seeding) |
Ave |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS (ranked by %) |
|
15-game Matches |
| SPs |
Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
GBQ |
|
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
->QF1 |
HUNGARY A (1) |
1933 |
|
75 |
44 |
9 |
22 |
|
865.8 |
58% |
-9.0 |
|
HUN A |
4 |
|
1 |
| 2nd |
->QF3 |
AUSTRALIA B |
1766 |
|
75 |
36 |
3 |
36 |
|
776.9 |
52% |
0.0 |
|
AUS B |
4 |
|
1 |
| 3rd |
|
UNITED STATES A (7) |
1845 |
|
75 |
35 |
4 |
36 |
|
751.0 |
50% |
+2.5 |
|
USA A |
2 |
|
3 |
| 4th |
|
REST of the WORLD A |
1647 |
|
75 |
35 |
4 |
36 |
|
734.4 |
49% |
+4.5 |
|
RoW A |
3 |
|
2 |
| 5th |
|
FRANCE B |
1811 |
|
75 |
33 |
6 |
36 |
|
732.1 |
49% |
+4.5 |
|
FRA B |
1 |
|
4 |
| 6th |
|
REST of EUROPE A |
1577 |
|
75 |
27 |
4 |
44 |
|
639.8 |
43% |
+13.5 |
|
RoE A |
1 |
|
4 |
| Reigning
Champions HUN A got off to a slow start with their new young star having his
worst couple of weeks of the year |
| but soon
recovered to take the lead and pulled away to 9 games ahead in the end. There
followed an epic battle for 2nd |
| place
involving no less than four teams, with AUS B finally prevailing after
narrowly winning their match against HUN A, |
| the only team
to manage that this year. Three teams pushed them close, with no. 7 seeds USA
A just missing out and |
| RoW A doing
particularly well, given their seeding point average before the tournament,
to edge out FRA B for 4th place. |
| Click here to send an email
to the day to day AC for Group A, Paul Smith ("eratos") |
| The
independent 'consultant' AC for Group A is Ben Polman ("benopi") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3rd WORLD TEAM TANTRIX
2004 |
GROUP B |
after |
225 |
out of |
225 |
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team (seeding) |
Ave |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS (ranked by %) |
|
15-game Matches |
| SPs |
Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
GBQ |
|
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
->QF2 |
GREAT BRITAIN & NI A (3) |
1921 |
|
75 |
46 |
5 |
24 |
|
873.3 |
58% |
-5.0 |
|
GBR A |
5 |
|
|
| 2nd |
->QF4 |
AUSTRALIA A |
1828 |
|
75 |
41 |
6 |
28 |
+2 |
824.3 |
55% |
0.0 |
|
AUS A |
3 |
|
2 |
| 3rd |
|
GERMANY A (6) |
1846 |
|
75 |
36 |
4 |
35 |
|
761.0 |
51% |
+6.5 |
|
GER A |
3 |
|
2 |
| 4th |
|
HUNGARY D |
1642 |
|
75 |
32 |
4 |
39 |
|
704.2 |
47% |
+12.0 |
|
HUN D |
2 |
|
3 |
| 5th |
|
UNITED STATES B |
1670 |
|
75 |
30 |
4 |
41 |
-2 |
680.1 |
45% |
+14.5 |
|
USA B |
1 |
|
4 |
| 6th |
|
NETHERLANDS A |
1773 |
|
75 |
27 |
3 |
45 |
|
657.1 |
44% |
+16.5 |
|
NED A |
1 |
|
4 |
| For the first
week or so, GBR A stormed ahead in this group with GER A also looking fairly
comfortable in 2nd, but after a |
| couple of
years in the doldrums, the Australians finally found some consistently good
form in a global competition and when |
| the Germans
began to falter, AUS A took their qualifying place away from them, even
looking to have an outside chance of |
| winning the
group at one stage. Just like their B team, HUN D did very well to finish two
places above their seeding position. |
| The
temporarily replaced AC for Group B is Maria Erdey-Gruz ("egmaria") |
| Click here to send an e-mail to the
stand-in AC for Group B, Phil Sneddon ("Runes") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3rd WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2004 |
GROUP C |
after |
225 |
out of |
225 |
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
Tue. |
Team (seeding) |
Ave |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS (ranked by %) |
|
15-game Matches |
| SPs |
Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
GBQ |
|
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
->QF3 |
HUNGARY B |
1782 |
|
75 |
41 |
5 |
29 |
|
813.5 |
54% |
-0.5 |
|
HUN B |
3 |
|
2 |
| 2nd |
->QF1 |
GREAT BRITAIN & NI B (4) |
1860 |
|
75 |
40 |
4 |
31 |
|
810.7 |
54% |
0.0 |
|
GBR B |
3 |
|
2 |
| 3rd |
up 1 |
FRANCE A (5) |
1854 |
|
75 |
35 |
5 |
35 |
|
745.6 |
50% |
+6.5 |
|
FRA A |
3 |
|
2 |
| 4th |
up 1 |
GERMANY B |
1735 |
|
75 |
34 |
5 |
36 |
|
743.6 |
50% |
+6.5 |
|
GER B |
2 |
|
3 |
| 5th |
dn 2 |
NEW ZEALAND B |
1689 |
|
75 |
35 |
4 |
36 |
|
742.9 |
50% |
+7.0 |
|
NZL B |
3 |
|
2 |
| 6th |
= |
POLAND A |
1644 |
|
75 |
25 |
7 |
43 |
|
643.7 |
43% |
+16.5 |
|
POL A |
1 |
|
4 |
| The only group
with no team that had Ave SPs > 1900, this was likely to be hard-fought
and so it proved. HUN B, with some |
| players whose
Elos do not yet reflect their breakthroughs in the HUN Championship. Despite
losing their match v GBR B, a |
| better
performance v NZL B in particular helped HUN B finish just 2.8 TPs ahead of
the no. 4 seeds. Amazingly, less than 3 |
| TPs separated
3rd-5th places too! First GER B and then NZL B looked like they might even
edge into 2nd at one point but |
| FRA
A, weakened by losing their first-choice no. 4 soon after the start, overtook
them both to snatch 3rd right at the end. |
| Click here to send an
email to the day to day AC for Group C, Laurence Pacull ("lorene") |
| The
independent 'consultant' AC for Group C is Brad Swanlund ("brad") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3rd WORLD TEAM TANTRIX 2004 |
GROUP D |
after |
225 |
out of |
225 |
games, 100% |
|
| Pos. |
QUAL. |
Team (seeding) |
Ave |
Nat |
Indiv. Games |
|
TOTALS (ranked by %) |
|
15-game Matches |
| SPs |
Pld |
W. |
D. |
L. |
P. |
TPs |
% |
GBQ |
|
Code |
W. |
D. |
L. |
| 1st |
->QF4 |
NEW ZEALAND A (2) |
1927 |
|
75 |
49 |
8 |
18 |
|
939.4 |
63% |
-11.5 |
|
NZL A |
5 |
|
|
| 2nd |
->QF2 |
GREAT BRITAIN & NI C (8) |
1829 |
|
75 |
41 |
5 |
29 |
|
824.4 |
55% |
0.0 |
|
GBR C |
4 |
|
1 |
| 3rd |
|
HUNGARY C |
1742 |
|
75 |
29 |
8 |
38 |
|
698.4 |
47% |
+12.5 |
|
HUN C |
2 |
|
3 |
| 4th |
|
SWEDEN A |
1806 |
|
75 |
32 |
4 |
39 |
|
697.6 |
47% |
+12.5 |
|
SWE A |
2 |
|
3 |
| 5th |
|
ISRAEL A |
1570 |
|
75 |
28 |
8 |
39 |
|
674.7 |
45% |
+15.0 |
|
ISR A |
|
|
5 |
| 6th |
|
FRANCE C |
1704 |
|
75 |
29 |
1 |
45 |
|
665.5 |
44% |
+16.0 |
|
FRA C |
2 |
|
3 |
| The seeded
teams never looked in much danger in this group but 3rd-6th were very close
with HUN C edging out SWE A by |
| just 0.8 TPs
(0.05%!) and FRA C finishing 6th despite winning two matches due to a huge
14-0 (with 1 draw) loss to NZL A. |
| Click
here to send an email to the day to day AC for G |
